← Rethinking the University: Beyond the Ivory Tower

Scoreboard

What should universities actually be for?

Podium

2 winning claims · settled

1

Universities should create stronger protections for good-faith intellectual dissent.

100%

agree

Agree 3 | Disagree 0 | Needs work 0 · 3 votes

Author @Dry Aspen

Top community ABCs & 123s

Earned $0.00 USD

2

Academic groupthink is most dangerous when institutions become more concerned with protecting their reputation than confronting evidence of error or misconduct.

100%

agree

Agree 3 | Disagree 0 | Needs work 0 · 3 votes

Author @Dry Aspen

Top community ABCs & 123s

Earned $0.00 USD

85% agreement ✓

Universities should create stronger protections for good-faith intellectual dissent.

100%

agree

3 agree (100%) 0 disagree (0%) 0 needs work (0%) 3 votes
85% agreement ✓

Academic groupthink is most dangerous when institutions become more concerned with protecting their reputation than confronting evidence of error or misconduct.

100%

agree

3 agree (100%) 0 disagree (0%) 0 needs work (0%) 3 votes

A university should not be expected to preserve an academic discipline simply because that discipline has historically existed within the institution.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

Universities should give greater institutional support to fields that address demonstrated skills shortages or important social needs.

33%

agree

1 agree (33%) 1 disagree (33%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @votesmash_gregory don't they already do this?

Some university disciplines have become sufficiently detached from their original scholarly purposes that they should be substantially reformed or discontinued.

33%

agree

1 agree (33%) 1 disagree (33%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @Warm Ember which ones? what happens to the scholars / scientists who believe they're the opposite of detached, & that they're indispensable

Academic institutions need genuine intellectual diversity to produce better knowledge.

0%

agree

0 agree (0%) 1 disagree (50%) 1 needs work (50%) 2 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @votesmash_gregory it helps, but cannot be the main focus itself

Fear of professional or social consequences can discourage academics from expressing legitimate dissent.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @Dry Aspen shouldn't they be strong enough or paid to not be discouraged from proper dissent?

Going beyond the ivory towers requires changing the current incentives that determine who gets heard, funded, published, promoted, and trusted.

0%

agree

0 agree (0%) 1 disagree (33%) 2 needs work (67%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @votesmash_gregory easy to suggest changing incentives ... to what?

Academic institutions should distinguish between rejecting poor scholarship and suppressing unpopular ideas.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @Warm Ember seems like a good idea, but who it could become like intellectual policing

Tour stats

Participants
4
Ticket holders
0
Free participants
4
Survey responses
15
Claims submitted
9
Claims voted on
9
Claims that reached 85%
2
Total votes cast
26

Leaderboard

No payouts yet.

How did it go?

How did it go?

1 = poor question, 5 = excellent question

1 = not at all, 5 = very satisfied

1 = fell short, 5 = exceeded expectations

Not likely Very likely