← Universities and the Information War

Scoreboard

How should educators distinguish between misinformation, legitimate dissent, emerging knowledge, and genuinely unsupported claims?

Podium

2 winning claims · settled

1

Academic and scientific claims should remain open to questioning, criticism, and revision when new evidence provides good reason to reconsider them.

100%

agree

Agree 4 | Disagree 0 | Needs work 0 · 4 votes

Author @Spare Leaf

Top community De-Propagandize Us

Ambassador academic freedom, canada, decentralized ledger technology, peace agreement, tea, ABCs & 123s, De-Propagandize Us, Global Village, I Am Not Satoshi Nakamoto, The Precariat

Earned $0.00 USD

2

A university can unintentionally contribute to misinformation when institutional consensus, disciplinary assumptions, or ideological commitments discourage serious examination of contrary evidence.

100%

agree

Agree 3 | Disagree 0 | Needs work 0 · 3 votes

Author @Fast Wren

Top community ABCs & 123s

Earned $0.00 USD

85% agreement ✓

Academic and scientific claims should remain open to questioning, criticism, and revision when new evidence provides good reason to reconsider them.

100%

agree

4 agree (100%) 0 disagree (0%) 0 needs work (0%) 4 votes
85% agreement ✓

A university can unintentionally contribute to misinformation when institutional consensus, disciplinary assumptions, or ideological commitments discourage serious examination of contrary evidence.

100%

agree

3 agree (100%) 0 disagree (0%) 0 needs work (0%) 3 votes

Universities should distinguish between legitimate intellectual disagreement and claims that lack sufficient evidence to support them.

0%

agree

0 agree (0%) 2 disagree (50%) 2 needs work (50%) 4 votes

Did not reach 85%

2 suggestions on what needs work
  • @El Laminator How does one define "lack sufficient evidence"?
  • @Fast Wren how can they do this?

A university can unintentionally contribute to misinformation when institutional consensus, disciplinary assumptions, or ideological commitments discourage serious examination of contrary evidence.

75%

agree

3 agree (75%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (25%) 4 votes

Did not reach 85%

Universities have a responsibility to identify and address ideological conformity when it discourages students or scholars from questioning widely accepted ideas.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

1 suggestion on what needs work
  • @Spare Leaf what kind of responsibility?

Depends on the person making the claim and what the claim is about, such as who the claim benefits, the influence of the claimer, the reason they are making the claim and how easy it is to make.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 1 disagree (33%) 0 needs work (0%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

Students should be encouraged to develop intellectual humility by recognizing that both experts and students can be mistaken.

67%

agree

2 agree (67%) 0 disagree (0%) 1 needs work (33%) 3 votes

Did not reach 85%

Tour stats

Participants
4
Ticket holders
0
Free participants
4
Survey responses
24
Claims submitted
7
Claims voted on
7
Claims that reached 85%
2
Total votes cast
24

Leaderboard

No payouts yet.

How did it go?

How did it go?

1 = poor question, 5 = excellent question

1 = not at all, 5 = very satisfied

1 = fell short, 5 = exceeded expectations

Not likely Very likely